Fertilizers & Agrochemicals
Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited manufactures and sells fertilizers and chemicals in India. The company operates in two segments, Fertilizer Products and Industrial Products. It offers fertilizers, including neem urea, di-ammonium phosphate, boronated NPK, ammonium phosphate sulphate, ammonium sulphate, APS, muriate of potash, gypsum, and micro mix. The company provides industrial products, such as v, nylon-6, anhydrous ammonia, cyclohexanone, sulphuric acid, technical grade urea, melamine, methyl ethyl ketoxime, hydroxylamine sulphate crystal, cyclohexane, argon gas, oleum, as well as methanol, nitric acid, ammonium sulphate, anone-anol mixture, melamine cyanurate, and potassium dihydrogen phosphate. In addition, the company offers water soluble fertilizers; sulphur based products; plant tissue culture products; micro nutrients; soil conditioners; organic products; and seeds. Further, it is involved in the provision of agro services; trading of agro input products; provision of port and logistics related services; and treatment and supply of waste water. The company was incorporated in 1962 and is based in Vadodara, India.
Dividend: Dividend paying stock. Dividend yield of 2.2%.
Smart Money: Smart money is taking extra interest in the stock as they increase their holdings.
Buy Backs: Company has bought back it's stock in the past which is a good thing.
Balance Sheet: Strong Balance Sheet.
Size: Market Cap wise it is among the top 20% companies of india.
Growth: Poor revenue growth. Revenue grew at a disappointing -0.4% on a trailing 12-month basis.
Comprehensive comparison against sector averages
GSFC metrics compared to Fertilizers
Category | GSFC | Fertilizers |
---|---|---|
PE | 13.70 | 21.72 |
PS | 0.75 | 1.26 |
Growth | -0.4 % | -0.8 % |
GSFC vs Fertilizers (2021 - 2025)
Summary of Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem.'s latest earnings call, featuring management's outlook on business performance, financial results, and analyst Q&A sessions that highlight key strategic initiatives and market challenges.
Last updated: Aug 24
Outlook by Management:
GSFC anticipates sustained fertilizer demand driven by favorable monsoon conditions and improved Kharif prospects. Fertilizer margins remain under pressure due to reduced subsidies (-13% YoY) and elevated raw material costs (benzene, natural gas). However, prompt subsidy disbursements support liquidity. The company is optimizing product mix (prioritizing APS/NPK over DAP due to negative DAP margins) to enhance profitability. Industrial products face challenges from Chinese dumping, but new initiatives like HX Crystal production (value-added caprolactam derivative) and cost optimization (importing cheaper Anone) aim to improve margins.
Key Points:
(Characters: 1,838)
Last updated: Aug 24
Question 1:
"In the last interaction...whether those discounts of INR2,000 per ton, which we have offered last quarter was withdrawn...and over and above that, that INR15 increase in the subsidy would have helped us...was the improved performance because of some benefits...natural gas converting to ammonia?"
Answer:
Subsidy increases for APS were minimal. Discounts on ammonium sulphate softened slightly due to revised MRP and lean seasonality. Natural gas costs rose 6% YoY but were offset by urea subsidy pass-through. Ammonia production at Sikka relies on imports, with gas prices at INR45/SM3 in Q1.
Question 2:
"What broad range of per ton margins we should work with...for ammonium sulphate, DAP, NPK, and urea?"
Answer:
Average fertilizer margins: INR2,000"“2,500/ton, but DAP margins are negative. Urea margins are lower due to energy penalties and fixed costs.
Question 3:
"When will our phosphoric acid production ramp up...dependency on imports reduce? Would DAP volumes/margins improve?"
Answer:
Phosphoric acid self-sufficiency at Sikka will take 2"“3 years. Baroda unit already uses in-house phosphoric acid. DAP margins may turn positive if subsidies increase, but current contributions remain negative.
Question 4:
"How are DAP inventory accumulation and NBS subsidy revisions impacting margins? What is DAP's negative impact on Q1?"
Answer:
DAP production continues despite negative margins (INR42 crore dent in Q1) due to anticipated subsidy hikes. Current DAP sales prioritize farmer needs and government pressure; breakeven is expected if subsidies rise by INR3,500/ton.
Question 5:
"What is the capex and timeline for HX Crystal, sulphuric acid, and urea projects? Impact on margins?"
Answer:
INR1,000 crore allocated for HX Crystal, sulphuric acid, urea revamp, and solar projects in FY25. HX Crystal (commissioned by FY25 end) will boost IP margins via value-added products. Urea revamp will cut energy use and raise capacity by 323 TPD, improving profitability.
Question 6:
"What is the outlook for industrial chemicals amid Chinese dumping? Capro-benzene breakeven levels?"
Answer:
IP segment faces pressure from cheap Chinese imports. Capro-benzene spread needs ~$700/ton to breakeven (currently $582). Mitigation includes importing cheaper raw materials (Anone) and diversifying into HX Crystal (higher margins).
Question 7:
"Post-urea revamp, what energy efficiency gains and margin improvements are expected?"
Answer:
Revamp will reduce energy use from 6.5"“6.6 Gcal/ton to 5.9 Gcal/ton, aligning with government norms. Capacity rises to 1,123 TPD, adding INR30+ crore annual profit. Current urea margins remain low due to legacy inefficiencies.
Analysis of Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem.'s financial performance, highlighting revenue trends, growth patterns, and key metrics through quarterly analysis.
Last Updated: Dec 31, 2024
Description | Share | Value |
---|---|---|
FERTILIZER PRODUCTS | 79.3% | 2.2 kCr |
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS | 20.7% | 583.5 Cr |
Total | 2.8 kCr |
Investor Care | |
---|---|
Dividend Yield | 2.2% |
Dividend/Share (TTM) | 4 |
Shares Dilution (1Y) | 0.00% |
Diluted EPS (TTM) | 13.78 |
Financial Health | |
---|---|
Current Ratio | 4.23 |
Debt/Equity | 0.01 |
Debt/Cashflow | -107.23 |
Valuation | |
---|---|
Market Cap | 7.57 kCr |
Price/Earnings (Trailing) | 13.97 |
Price/Sales (Trailing) | 0.77 |
EV/EBITDA | 8.46 |
Price/Free Cashflow | -15.52 |
MarketCap/EBT | 10.94 |
Fundamentals | |
---|---|
Revenue (TTM) | 9.89 kCr |
Rev. Growth (Yr) | 37.39% |
Rev. Growth (Qtr) | 2.96% |
Earnings (TTM) | 542.11 Cr |
Earnings Growth (Yr) | 13.44% |
Earnings Growth (Qtr) | -55.12% |
Profitability | |
---|---|
Operating Margin | 6.92% |
EBT Margin | 7% |
Return on Equity | 4.04% |
Return on Assets | 3.41% |
Free Cashflow Yield | -6.44% |
Detailed comparison of Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem. against industry peers, highlighting key financial metrics, valuation ratios, and performance indicators to provide competitive context within the sector.
Ticker | Name | Mkt Cap | Revenue | Price %, 1M | Returns, 1Y | P/E | P/S | Rev 1-Yr | Inc 1-Yr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COROMANDEL | Coromandel InternationalFertilizers | 65.92 kCr | 23.33 kCr | +12.89% | +88.90% | 40.19 | 2.83 | -2.06% | -4.82% |
CHAMBLFERT | Chambal Fertilisers & ChemicalsFertilizers | 27.68 kCr | 17.06 kCr | +10.46% | +63.40% | 17.13 | 1.62 | -10.89% | +26.94% |
DEEPAKFERT | Deepak Fertilizers &PetrochemicalsCommodity Chemicals | 16.59 kCr | 9.8 kCr | +17.71% | +111.54% | 18.71 | 1.69 | +3.66% | +79.09% |
RCF | Rashtriya Chemicals & FertilizersFertilizers | 7.7 kCr | 17.23 kCr | +11.21% | -8.16% | 29.04 | 0.45 | -4.00% | -8.43% |
NFL | National FertilizersFertilizers | 4.23 kCr | 20.71 kCr | +7.24% | -18.45% | 16.46 | 0.2 | -16.37% | +187.50% |
Understand Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem. ownership landscape with insights into key distribution patterns, offering investors a clear view of stakeholder dynamics.
Shareholder Name | Holding % |
---|---|
GUJARAT STATE INVETMENTS LIMITED | 37.84% |
QUANT MUTUAL FUND - QUANT SMALL CAP FUND | 3.32% |
Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Company Limited | 1.88% |
Gujarat Alkalies And Chemicals Limited | 1.88% |
ICICI PRUDENTIAL SMALL CAP FUND | 1.36% |
Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Ltd | 1.25% |
Societies | 0.57% |
Distribution across major stakeholders
Distribution across major institutional holders